D
e
m
a
t
er
i
a
lism
D
e
l
e
g
isl
a
t
i
on
,
nd
T
he
pre
v
en
t
i
on
o
f
c
ompe
t
i
t
i
on
f
or
w
ea
l
t
h
and
po
w
er
is
a
ne
c
e
ss
ar
y
and
s
u
ff
ici
en
t
c
ond
i
t
i
on
f
or
U
n
i
v
er
s
a
l
S
u
s
t
a
i
nab
l
e
H
app
i
ne
ss
. A
n
y
me
t
hod
w
ha
t
e
v
er
f
or
a
c
h
i
e
v
i
n
g
t
h
is is
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
. A
n
y
s
o
ci
e
t
y
i
n
w
h
ic
h
i
t
is
po
ssi
b
l
e
f
or
one
per
s
on
t
o
c
ompe
t
e
f
or
g
rea
t
er
ma
t
er
i
a
l w
ea
l
t
h
or
a
g
rea
t
er
s
hare
i
n
po
s
t
er
i
t
y
t
han
o
t
her
s is
doomed
.
T
ab
l
e
o
f
C
on
t
en
t
s
O
ur
C
r
isis
O
ur
c
r
isis
ha
s
a
ph
y
sic
a
l c
omponen
t
and
an
i
ma
gi
nar
y
c
omponen
t
. T
he
ph
y
sic
a
l
c
omponen
t
c
ome
s
f
rom
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
on
s i
n
t
he
quan
t
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
l
and
, w
a
t
er
, c
on
s
umab
l
e
ener
g
y
,
and
t
he
en
v
i
ronmen
t
i
t
s
e
l
f
. T
he
e
c
o
l
o
gic
a
l
f
oo
t
pr
i
n
t
o
f
t
he
human
ra
c
e
e
x
c
eed
s
t
he
c
arr
y
i
n
g c
apa
ci
t
y
o
f
E
ar
t
h
. T
he
i
ma
gi
nar
y
c
omponen
t
is i
n
s
t
ab
ili
t
y
i
n
t
he
mone
t
ar
y
s
y
s
t
em
c
au
s
ed
b
y
e
x
c
e
ssi
v
e
deb
t
and
e
x
c
e
ssi
v
e
mone
t
ar
y
i
nequa
li
t
y
.
T
o
ame
li
ora
t
e
t
he
ph
y
sic
a
l c
r
isis w
e
mu
s
t
e
li
m
i
na
t
e
t
he
i
ma
gi
nar
y
one
. I
do
no
t
mean
t
ha
t
i
ndeb
t
edne
ss,
po
v
er
t
y
,
and
w
ea
l
t
h
are
i
ma
gi
nar
y
;
bu
t
,
ra
t
her
,
t
ha
t
w
e
c
an
e
li
m
i
na
t
e
a
ll
t
hree
wi
t
h
t
he
app
lic
a
t
i
on
o
f
our
i
ma
gi
na
t
i
on
s wi
t
hou
t
a
ff
e
c
t
i
n
g
t
he
ph
y
sic
a
l
un
i
v
er
s
e
.
S
t
ab
ili
z
i
n
g
our
popu
l
a
t
i
on
and
redu
ci
n
g
our
e
c
o
l
o
gic
a
l
f
oo
t
pr
i
n
t
will
u
l
t
i
ma
t
e
l
y
ha
v
e
a
de
si
rab
l
e
e
ff
e
c
t
upon
t
he
un
i
v
er
s
e
.
R
e
g
ard
l
e
ss
o
f
w
ha
t
t
he
peop
l
e
w
an
t
,
t
he
o
w
ner
s
o
f
t
he
c
oun
t
r
y
w
an
t
t
o
re
t
a
i
n
t
he
i
r
po
si
t
i
on
s
o
f
po
w
er
,
pr
i
v
il
e
g
e
,
and
w
ea
l
t
h
.
N
a
t
ura
ll
y
,
t
he
y
de
s
p
is
e
t
he
i
dea
o
f
g
o
v
ernmen
t
c
on
t
ro
l
o
f
t
he
e
c
onom
y
and
t
he
mean
s
o
f
produ
c
t
i
on
;
ho
w
e
v
er
, w
hen
a
c
r
isis
ar
is
e
s
t
ha
t
t
he
y
c
anno
t
hand
l
e
,
t
he
y
read
il
y
a
cc
ede
t
o
c
r
isis s
o
ci
a
lis
m
t
o
s
a
v
e
t
hem
.
D
ur
i
n
g W
or
l
d
W
ar
II, wi
t
hou
t
adop
t
i
n
g s
o
ci
a
lis
m
c
omp
l
e
t
e
l
y
,
t
he
y
2
a
ll
o
w
ed
ra
t
i
on
i
n
g, w
a
g
e
and
pr
ic
e
c
on
t
ro
l,
and
mana
g
emen
t
o
f
v
i
t
a
l i
ndu
s
t
r
i
e
s
b
y
g
o
v
ernmen
t
emp
l
o
y
ee
s
(
a
l
be
i
t
member
s
o
f
t
he
t
rad
i
t
i
ona
l
ru
li
n
g cl
a
ss
)
e
v
en
i
f
t
he
y
w
ere
pa
i
d
on
l
y
one
do
ll
ar
per
y
ear
.
T
o
re
s
pond
appropr
i
a
t
e
l
y
t
o
re
s
our
c
e
and
en
v
i
ronmen
t
a
l li
m
i
t
s, w
e
need
t
o
e
s
t
ab
lis
h
c
r
isis s
o
ci
a
lis
m
.
H
o
w
e
v
er
,
t
o
e
li
m
i
na
t
e
deb
t
, w
e
need
t
o
repud
i
a
t
e
t
he
U
S
do
ll
ar
;
and
,
t
o
e
li
m
i
na
t
e
i
nequa
li
t
y
, w
e
need
t
o
pa
y
e
v
er
y
one
t
he
s
ame
e
v
en
i
f
no
w
or
k
c
an
be
f
ound
f
or
t
hem
t
o
rep
l
a
c
e
t
he
i
ne
ss
en
t
i
a
l w
or
k
f
rom
w
h
ic
h
t
he
y
w
ere
f
ur
l
ou
g
hed
t
o
redu
c
e
our
c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
o
f
f
o
ssil
f
ue
ls
and
our
e
c
o
l
o
gic
a
l
f
oo
t
pr
i
n
t
. A
f
t
er
a
ll,
t
he
requ
i
remen
t
t
ha
t
e
v
er
y
ci
t
i
z
en
doe
s
u
s
e
f
u
l w
or
k
t
o
g
e
t
pa
i
d
and
t
he
requ
i
remen
t
t
ha
t
t
he
pa
y
s
hou
l
d
be
c
ommen
s
ura
t
e
wi
t
h
t
he
v
a
l
ue
o
f
t
he
w
or
k
are
c
omp
l
e
t
e
l
y
i
ma
gi
nar
y
. T
he
i
dea
t
ha
t
e
v
er
y
one
s
hou
l
d
be
a
ll
o
w
ed
t
o
g
e
t
a
s
mu
c
h
mone
y
a
s
he
c
an
is c
omp
l
e
t
e
l
y
w
ron
g.
B
u
t
c
r
isis s
o
ci
a
lis
m
is
a
l
on
g w
a
y
f
rom
D
ema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
.
F
or
e
x
amp
l
e
,
mo
s
t
o
f
u
s
s
t
ill
t
h
i
n
k
abou
t
mone
y
a
s
t
he
re
w
ard
f
or
c
on
t
r
i
bu
t
i
n
g s
ome
t
h
i
n
g
u
s
e
f
u
l
t
o
our
c
ommun
i
t
y
. T
he
amoun
t
o
f
mone
y
w
e
a
c
qu
i
re
is
t
he
sc
ore
i
n
t
he
g
ame
o
f
li
f
e
.
I
n
s
t
ead
, w
e
s
hou
l
d
t
h
i
n
k
o
f
mone
y
a
s
a
w
a
y
t
o
mea
s
ure
our
c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
o
f
sc
ar
c
e
na
t
ura
l c
ap
i
t
a
l, w
h
ic
h
w
e
c
an
do
on
c
e
a
g
a
i
n
wi
t
h
a
ra
t
i
ona
l
mone
t
ar
y
s
y
s
t
em
ba
s
ed
upon
ph
y
sic
a
l
quan
t
i
t
i
e
s w
h
ic
h
w
e
no
w
ha
v
e
sci
en
t
i
f
ic w
a
y
s
t
o
mea
s
ure
ra
t
her
t
han
l
e
tt
i
n
g
mar
k
e
t
s s
e
t
pr
ic
e
s.
B
e
li
e
f
i
n
t
he
“i
n
v
isi
b
l
e
hand
”
o
f
t
he
mar
k
e
t
is
no
w
qu
i
t
e
g
enera
ll
y
re
c
o
g
n
i
z
ed
a
s
be
li
e
f
i
n
ma
gic
and
,
a
s s
u
c
h
,
no
be
tt
er
t
han
be
li
e
f
i
n
a
s
t
ro
l
o
g
y
. W
e
s
ha
ll s
ho
w
t
ha
t
t
here
is
no
w
a
y
t
o
j
u
s
t
i
fy
an
y
t
h
i
n
g
bu
t
equa
li
t
y
i
n
c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
.
D
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
on
s
D
e
mat
e
r
i
a
li
sm
D
ema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
re
f
er
s
t
o
an
y
po
li
t
ic
a
l
e
c
onom
y
i
n
w
h
ic
h
,
due
t
o
t
he
s
t
ru
c
t
ure
and
arran
g
emen
t
o
f
t
he
i
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
on
s, i
t
is
no
t
po
ssi
b
l
e
f
or
an
y
member
o
f
t
he
c
ommun
i
t
y
t
o
a
c
qu
i
re
more
w
ea
l
t
h
or
ma
t
er
i
a
l
re
s
our
c
e
s
t
han
ano
t
her
.
R
e
s
our
c
e
dom
i
nan
c
e
h
i
erar
c
h
i
e
s c
anno
t
ar
is
e
. I
n
f
a
c
t
,
t
he
i
nd
i
v
i
dua
l’s s
hare
i
n
t
he
ne
t
produ
c
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
c
ommun
i
t
y
is
no
t
i
n
p
l
a
y
. T
he
t
erm
ma
y
be
app
li
ed
t
o
t
he
be
li
e
f
i
n
or
ded
ic
a
t
i
on
t
o
s
u
c
h
a
po
li
t
ic
a
l
e
c
onom
y
. T
he
pr
i
n
ci
pa
l
j
u
s
t
i
f
ic
a
t
i
on
f
or
t
h
is
w
or
k
is
t
ha
t
i
t
c
orre
c
t
s
t
he
prob
l
em
s wi
t
h
M
ar
x
is
m
t
ha
t
ha
v
e
c
on
t
r
i
bu
t
ed
t
o
pre
v
i
ou
s
a
tt
emp
t
s
t
o
rep
l
a
c
e
C
ap
i
t
a
lis
m
, w
h
ic
h
,
a
s w
e
s
ha
ll s
ee
, is i
n
t
r
i
n
sic
a
ll
y
un
s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
l
e
.
3
D
e
c
e
ntra
liz
at
i
o
n
D
i
re
c
t
A
r
is
t
o
t
e
li
an
demo
c
ra
c
y
is
t
he
ba
sis
f
or
t
he
s
o
-c
a
ll
ed
F
ra
c
t
a
l
G
o
v
ernmen
t
propo
s
ed
here
s
o
a
s
t
o
en
s
ure
t
ha
t
a
ll
po
li
t
ic
a
l
po
w
er
is
re
t
a
i
ned
b
y
t
he
peop
l
e
.
S
i
n
c
e
e
v
er
y
ci
t
i
z
en
mu
s
t
be
a
member
o
f
a
c
ommun
i
t
y
c
oun
cil w
h
ic
h
de
t
erm
i
ne
s
pub
lic
po
lic
y
,
t
he
v
ill
a
g
e
or
ne
ig
hborhood
,
t
he
ba
sic
po
li
t
ic
a
l
mo
l
e
c
u
l
e
,
mu
s
t
be
s
ma
ll
enou
g
h
t
o
3
be
e
ff
e
c
t
i
v
e
. T
hu
s
de
c
en
t
ra
li
z
a
t
i
on
mu
s
t
be
t
he
u
l
t
i
ma
t
e
g
oa
l
re
g
ard
l
e
ss
o
f
ho
w
t
he
pre
s
en
t
s
y
s
t
em
ha
s
t
o
be
a
cc
ommoda
t
ed
. I
n
par
t
ic
u
l
ar
,
t
he
l
ar
g
e
s
t
i
den
t
i
f
i
ab
l
e
po
li
t
ic
a
l
un
i
t
s
hou
l
d
be
t
he
dra
i
na
g
e
re
gi
on
, i.
e
.,
t
he
c
on
t
ig
uou
s
por
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
l
and
t
ha
t
dra
i
n
s i
n
t
o
c
ommon
re
s
er
v
o
i
r
s wi
t
hou
t
an
y
o
f
t
he
ne
ig
hbor
i
n
g
area
s
dra
i
n
i
n
g i
n
t
o
i
t
. T
h
is is
t
he
f
undamen
t
a
l
un
i
t
o
f
l
and
i
n
e
c
o
l
o
g
y
.
(
P
ro
f
e
ss
or
J
or
g
e
G
ab
i
tt
o
,
f
ormer
l
y
t
he
c
ha
i
rman
o
f
t
he
depar
t
men
t
o
f
c
hem
ic
a
l
en
gi
neer
i
n
g
a
t
P
ra
i
r
i
e
Vi
e
w
U
n
i
v
er
si
t
y
,
po
i
n
t
ed
ou
t
t
ha
t
our
map
s
are
dra
w
n
i
n
t
he
mo
s
t
re
g
re
tt
ab
l
e
manner
f
rom
t
he
v
i
e
w
po
i
n
t
o
f
e
c
o
l
o
g
y
.
R
i
v
er
s
ma
k
e
c
on
v
en
i
en
t
border
s
f
or
map
ma
k
er
s
bu
t
no
t
f
or
e
c
o
l
o
gis
t
s.
)
T
he
s
pa
c
e
be
t
w
een
t
he
ba
sic
mo
l
e
c
u
l
e
s
and
t
he
g
o
v
ern
i
n
g
bod
y
o
f
t
he
en
t
i
re
e
c
o
l
o
gic
a
l
re
gi
on
is
t
he
f
ra
c
t
a
l-li
k
e
s
t
ru
c
t
ure
s
ho
w
n
i
n
F
ig
ure
2. A
dd
i
t
i
ona
l
ne
c
e
ssi
t
i
e
s
f
or
de
c
en
t
ra
li
z
a
t
i
on
are
w
e
ll
k
no
w
n
.
F
ig
ure
1.
F
ra
c
t
a
l
4
F
ig
ure
2.
F
ra
c
t
a
l P
o
li
t
ic
a
l
S
t
ru
c
t
ure
D
e
mar
c
hy
D
emar
c
h
y
is
our
name
f
or
a
po
li
t
ic
a
l
e
c
onom
y
i
n
w
h
ic
h
d
is
t
i
n
g
u
is
hed
member
s
o
f
t
he
g
o
v
ernmen
t
s
u
c
h
a
s
po
li
t
ic
a
l
repre
s
en
t
a
t
i
v
e
s
are
c
ho
s
en
b
y
s
or
t
i
t
i
on
,
t
he
s
em
i
random
me
t
hod
w
e
norma
ll
y
emp
l
o
y
i
n
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
n
g
j
uror
s.
D
e
l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
o
n
O
ur
v
a
s
t
s
y
s
t
em
s
o
f
l
a
w
are
r
i
d
ic
u
l
ou
s. L
a
ws s
hou
l
d
be
rep
l
a
c
ed
b
y
a
f
e
w si
mp
l
e
mora
l
a
x
i
om
s
f
rom
w
h
ic
h
r
ig
h
t
a
c
t
i
on
c
an
be
der
i
v
ed
ea
sil
y
. W
e
s
hou
l
d
embra
c
e
ra
t
i
ona
l
mora
ls
t
ha
t
an
y
one
c
an
f
o
ll
o
w
a
s
oppo
s
ed
t
o
re
ligi
ou
s s
uper
s
t
i
t
i
on
s
and
s
e
x
ua
l
and
pharma
c
o
l
o
gic
a
l
pruder
y
t
ha
t
no
per
s
on
o
f
s
p
i
r
i
t
c
an
li
v
e
b
y
.
D
iss
en
t
s
hou
l
d
be
t
o
l
era
t
ed
and
e
v
en
t
ho
s
e
w
ho
do
no
t
a
cc
ep
t
our
ra
t
i
ona
l
mora
li
t
y
s
hou
l
d
be
a
cc
orded
t
he
d
ig
n
i
t
y
o
f
s
o
v
ere
ig
n
head
s
o
f
s
t
a
t
e
.
O
ur
s
y
s
t
em
o
f
mora
ls s
hou
l
d
be
der
i
v
ed
f
rom
a
c
omp
l
e
t
e
, s
e
l
f
-c
on
sis
t
en
t
,
mu
t
ua
ll
y
i
ndependen
t
s
e
t
o
f
f
i
r
s
t
pr
i
n
ci
p
l
e
s
t
ha
t
c
an
be
e
x
p
l
a
i
ned
t
o
a
si
x
-
y
ear
-
o
l
d
and
upon
w
h
ic
h
mo
s
t
edu
c
a
t
ed
peop
l
e
c
an
a
g
ree
. I
f
, i
n
add
i
t
i
on
,
t
ho
s
e
w
ho
d
iss
en
t
–
e
v
en
a
f
t
er
w
e
ha
v
e
emp
l
o
y
ed
our
mo
s
t
c
ompe
lli
n
g l
o
gic
a
l
t
e
s
t
i
mon
y
– c
an
be
5
a
cc
ommoda
t
ed
wi
t
hou
t
c
oer
ci
on
and
wi
t
hou
t
i
n
c
on
v
en
i
en
c
e
t
o
t
hem
s
e
l
v
e
s
or
u
s,
w
e
s
ha
ll
ha
v
e
done
v
er
y
w
e
ll i
ndeed
. –
O
n
t
he
P
re
s
er
v
a
t
i
on
o
f
S
pe
ci
e
s
L
a
ws
and
mora
ls s
hou
l
d
be
c
on
g
ruen
t
.
B
eha
v
i
or
t
ha
t
t
he
c
ommun
i
t
y
f
i
nd
s
i
mmora
l, c
an
be
l
e
g
a
l
on
l
y
i
n
an
i
n
c
omp
l
e
t
e
l
e
g
a
l s
y
s
t
em
; w
herea
s,
a
l
e
g
a
l s
y
s
t
em
t
ha
t
proh
i
b
i
t
s
mora
l
a
c
t
s is
t
y
rannou
s.
B
o
t
h
l
a
ws
and
mora
ls
are
ob
t
a
i
ned
f
or
t
he
c
on
v
en
i
en
c
e
o
f
t
he
c
ommun
i
t
y
,
pro
v
i
ded
t
he
requ
i
remen
t
s
o
f
s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
ili
t
y
are
me
t
. T
here
are
c
er
t
a
i
n
ae
s
t
he
t
ic
and
o
t
her
i
n
t
u
i
t
i
v
e
pr
i
n
ci
p
l
e
s
t
ha
t
w
e
hope
will
c
ome
i
n
t
o
p
l
a
y
. I s
ha
ll
a
tt
emp
t
t
o
j
u
s
t
i
fy
m
y
o
t
her
wis
e
arb
i
t
rar
y
c
ho
ic
e
s i
n
t
he
s
e
c
t
i
on
on
a
x
i
oma
t
ic
mora
li
t
y
be
l
o
w.
D
e
gr
o
wth
P
opu
l
a
t
i
on
D
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
I
t
ma
k
e
s s
en
s
e
t
o
en
t
er
i
n
t
o
t
he
re
c
ord
a
t
t
h
is
po
i
n
t
P
ro
f
e
ss
or
Al
B
ar
t
l
e
tt
’s
f
amou
s
t
a
l
k
, w
h
ic
h
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
s
ho
w
man
’s ig
noran
c
e
o
f
t
he
e
x
ponen
t
i
a
l
f
un
c
t
i
on
ha
s
a
ff
e
c
t
ed
our
pre
s
en
t
popu
l
a
t
i
on
c
r
isis:
As P
ro
f
.
B
ar
t
l
e
tt
pu
t
s i
t
:
C
an
y
ou
t
h
i
n
k
o
f
an
y
prob
l
em
i
n
an
y
area
o
f
human
endea
v
or
on
an
y
sc
a
l
e
,
f
rom
m
ic
ro
sc
op
ic
t
o
gl
oba
l, w
ho
s
e
l
on
g-
t
erm
s
o
l
u
t
i
on
is i
n
an
y
demon
s
t
rab
l
e
w
a
y
a
i
ded
,
a
ssis
t
ed
,
or
ad
v
an
c
ed
b
y
f
ur
t
her
i
n
c
rea
s
e
s i
n
popu
l
a
t
i
on
, l
o
c
a
ll
y
,
na
t
i
ona
ll
y
,
or
gl
oba
ll
y
?
- A.A.
B
ar
t
l
e
tt
,
J
anuar
y
8, 1996
I c
an
t
h
i
n
k
o
f
no
be
tt
er
t
r
i
bu
t
e
t
o
Al
B
ar
t
l
e
tt
t
han
t
o
emu
l
a
t
e
h
is c
ha
ll
en
g
e
: C
an
y
ou
t
h
i
n
k
o
f
an
y
s
o
ci
a
l
prob
l
em
on
an
y
sc
a
l
e
t
ha
t
is
no
t
e
x
a
c
erba
t
ed
b
y
t
he
i
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
on
o
f
pr
i
v
a
t
e
pro
f
i
t
?
I
n
par
t
ic
u
l
ar
, I cl
a
i
m
t
ha
t
popu
l
a
t
i
on
i
n
c
rea
s
e
is
w
or
s
ened
b
y
t
he
i
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
on
o
f
pr
i
v
a
t
e
pro
f
i
t
. T
he
prob
l
em
o
f
o
v
er
-
popu
l
a
t
i
on
will
no
t
be
s
o
l
v
ed
e
x
c
ep
t
b
y
D
i
e
-
Off
i
n
a
s
o
ci
e
t
y
t
ha
t
perm
i
t
s
pr
i
v
a
t
e
pro
f
i
t
.
I
f
I
ma
y
be
perm
i
tt
ed
t
o
wi
den
t
he
mean
i
n
g
o
f
t
he
t
erm
pr
i
v
a
t
e
pro
f
i
t
t
o
i
n
cl
ude
(
i
)
t
he
i
n
c
rea
s
e
o
f
t
he
propor
t
i
on
i
n
t
he
popu
l
a
t
i
on
o
f
one
s
ra
c
e
,
re
ligi
on
,
po
li
t
ics,
c
u
l
t
ure
,
or
po
i
n
t
o
f
v
i
e
w
and
(
ii
)
t
he
i
n
c
rea
s
e
i
n
one
s
o
w
n
or
one
s
emp
l
o
y
er
’s,
re
l
a
t
i
v
e
’s, c
o
ll
ea
g
ue
’s,
or
a
ll
y
’s
a
cc
umu
l
a
t
i
on
or
s
hare
o
f
ma
t
er
i
a
l w
ea
l
t
h
,
t
hen
m
y
c
ha
ll
en
g
e
t
o
t
he
w
or
l
d
is
t
o
name
a
si
n
gl
e
prob
l
em
o
f
human
i
t
y
t
ha
t
is
no
t
e
x
a
c
erba
t
ed
b
y
pr
i
v
a
t
e
pro
f
i
t
. I
t
is
t
he
t
erm
"
ma
t
er
i
a
l" i
n
"
ma
t
er
i
a
l w
ea
l
t
h
"
t
ha
t
s
upp
li
e
s
t
he
t
erm
"
ma
t
er
i
a
l" i
n
t
he
w
ord
"
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
".
6
H
ere
are
.
mp
4
and
Y
ou
T
ube
v
er
si
on
s
o
f
Al
ber
t
B
ar
t
l
e
tt
’s
f
amou
s
t
a
l
k
on
t
he
e
x
ponen
t
i
a
l
f
un
c
t
i
on
a
s i
t
app
li
e
s
t
o
popu
l
a
t
i
on
:
1.
2.
I
t
t
a
k
e
s
abou
t
10
k
il
o
c
a
l
or
i
e
s
o
f
pr
i
mar
y
ener
g
y
t
o
s
upp
l
y
one
k
il
o
c
a
l
or
i
e
i
n
our
d
i
e
t
s.
J
u
s
t
no
w, w
e
ha
v
e
enou
g
h
c
on
v
en
t
i
ona
l
and
f
ra
c
k
ed
o
il
t
o
s
uppor
t
an
a
g
r
ic
u
l
t
ure
s
e
c
t
or
t
ha
t
c
an
s
uppor
t
a
l
ar
g
e
o
v
er
-
popu
l
a
t
i
on
;
ho
w
e
v
er
,
t
here
are
c
ompe
lli
n
g
rea
s
on
s
t
o
abandon
f
o
ssil
f
ue
l c
h
i
e
f
amon
g w
h
ic
h
are
t
he
a
l
arm
i
n
gl
y
h
ig
h
probab
ili
t
y
o
f
c
a
t
a
s
t
roph
ic cli
ma
t
e
c
han
g
e
and
t
he
ab
s
o
l
u
t
e
c
er
t
a
i
n
t
y
t
ha
t
t
he
s
upp
l
y
o
f
f
o
ssil
f
ue
l is
f
i
n
i
t
e
and
e
v
en
t
ua
ll
y
will c
o
s
t
more
ener
g
y
t
o
har
v
e
s
t
t
han
i
t
will
re
t
urn
. P
erhap
s i
t
is
no
t
t
oo
s
oon
t
o
s
t
a
t
e
a
f
undamen
t
a
l
pr
i
n
ci
p
l
e
o
f
s
o
ci
a
l
p
l
ann
i
n
g
and
f
ore
c
a
s
t
i
n
g,
name
l
y
,
t
ha
t
an
y
e
v
en
t
i
n
t
he
f
u
t
ure
o
f
s
o
ci
e
t
y
t
ha
t
s
hou
l
d
be
e
x
pe
c
t
ed
s
oon
be
c
au
s
e
o
f
t
he
na
t
ure
o
f
t
he
e
x
ponen
t
i
a
l
f
un
c
t
i
on
s
hou
l
d
be
t
rea
t
ed
a
s
t
hou
g
h
i
t
will
o
cc
ur
t
omorro
w.
E
c
onom
ic
D
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
Th
e
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
G
r
owt
h Trap
I
t
r
i
ed
v
er
y
hard
t
o
pro
v
e
t
ha
t
c
ap
i
t
a
lis
m
requ
i
re
s
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
and
ended
up
wi
t
h
no
t
h
i
n
g
be
tt
er
t
han
a
rea
s
onab
l
e
a
v
i
d
D
e
l
ane
y
,
ho
w
e
v
er
,
pro
v
i
ded
a
c
omp
l
e
t
e
l
y
s
a
t
is
fy
i
n
g
e
x
p
l
ana
t
i
on
i
n
h
ic
h
be
c
ame
t
he
f
i
r
s
t
s
t
ep
i
n
t
he
ph
y
sic
a
l
ar
g
umen
t
f
or
D
ema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
.
“Th
e
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
G
r
owt
h Trap
”
by (
t
h
e
l
a
te
)
D
av
i
d
D
e
l
an
e
y
.
T
oda
y
(
01.23.06
)
I
read
“W
ha
t
t
o
do
i
n
a
f
a
ili
n
g ci
v
ili
z
a
t
i
on
”
b
y
D
a
v
i
d
M.
D
e
l
ane
y
. I
t
c
on
t
a
i
ned
t
he
be
s
t
e
x
p
l
ana
t
i
on
o
f
w
h
y
A
mer
ic
an
-s
t
y
l
e
c
ap
i
t
a
lis
m
requ
i
re
s g
ro
w
t
h
I
ha
v
e
e
v
er
s
een
. Wi
t
h
t
he
k
i
nd
perm
issi
on
o
f
t
he
au
t
hor
, i
t
is
repr
i
n
t
ed
be
l
o
w.
D
a
v
i
d
po
s
t
ed
t
he
f
u
ll
paper
and
h
is
o
t
her
e
ss
a
y
s
a
t
D
a
v
i
d
D
e
l
ane
y
d
i
ed
a
f
e
w
y
ear
s
ba
c
k
;
and
, I
no
l
on
g
er
k
no
w w
here
t
o
f
i
nd
h
is
e
x
c
e
ll
en
t
w
or
k
.
S
omeone
s
hou
l
d
do
w
ha
t
e
v
er
i
t
t
a
k
e
s
t
o
f
i
nd
t
h
is s
t
orehou
s
e
o
f
w
e
ll-c
on
si
dered
t
hou
g
h
t
.
7
Ec
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
requ
i
re
s i
n
c
rea
si
n
g
t
he
amoun
t
o
f
h
ig
h
qua
li
t
y
ener
g
y
and
ma
t
er
i
a
ls
de
g
raded
b
y
t
he
e
c
onom
y
ea
c
h
y
ear
. Ec
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
on
a
f
i
n
i
t
e
p
l
ane
t
will
e
v
en
t
ua
ll
y
s
t
op
. I
f
i
t
doe
s
no
t
e
x
hau
s
t
t
he
re
s
our
c
e
s
needed
f
or
i
t
s
c
on
t
i
nua
t
i
on
, i
t
will s
t
op
ear
li
er
f
or
s
ome
o
t
her
rea
s
on
. All
o
wi
n
g
re
s
our
c
e
dep
l
e
t
i
on
and
b
i
o
s
phere
de
g
rada
t
i
on
t
o
t
erm
i
na
t
e
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
will
produ
c
e
c
a
t
a
s
t
rophe
.
U
n
f
or
t
una
t
e
l
y
,
our
dependen
c
e
on
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
ma
k
e
s i
t
e
x
t
reme
l
y
un
li
k
e
l
y
t
ha
t
w
e
will gi
v
e
i
t
up
v
o
l
un
t
ar
il
y
be
f
ore
t
he
c
a
t
a
s
t
rophe
.
O
ur
dependen
c
e
ha
s
a
t
l
ea
s
t
f
our
a
s
pe
c
t
s: A
)
i
n
t
he
need
t
o
dea
l wi
t
h
ad
v
er
s
e
c
on
s
equen
c
e
s
o
f
l
abor
-
redu
ci
n
g i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
s,
B
)
i
n
c
ommer
ci
a
l
ban
k
mone
y
, C
)
i
n
t
he
need
t
o
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
o
l
eran
c
e
o
f
i
nequa
li
t
y
,
and
D)
i
n
f
i
nan
ci
a
l
mar
k
e
t
s.
A
)
T
he
f
i
r
s
t
dependen
c
e
on
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
is i
n
t
he
need
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
t
he
ad
v
er
s
e
c
on
s
equen
c
e
s
o
f
i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
s
t
ha
t
redu
c
e
t
he
need
f
or
l
abor
.1
B
y
de
f
i
n
i
t
i
on
,
ea
c
h
l
abor
-
redu
ci
n
g i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
e
i
t
her
i
n
c
rea
s
e
s
t
he
amoun
t
o
f
a
g
ood
produ
c
ed
or
t
hro
ws s
ome
peop
l
e
ou
t
o
f
w
or
k
.
F
i
rm
s
t
ha
t
c
rea
t
e
or
e
x
p
l
o
i
t
a
l
abor
-
redu
ci
n
g
i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
c
rea
t
e
ne
w
j
ob
s i
n
t
erna
ll
y
b
y
dr
i
v
i
n
g
o
t
her
f
i
rm
s
ou
t
o
f
bu
si
ne
ss. T
he
ne
w
j
ob
s i
mp
l
emen
t
i
n
g
t
he
i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
o
ff
s
e
t
t
he
l
o
ss
o
f
j
ob
s c
au
s
ed
b
y
t
he
i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
,
bu
t
t
he
i
nno
v
a
t
i
n
g
f
i
rm
s
don
’
t
ne
c
e
ss
ar
il
y
h
i
re
a
ll
o
f
t
he
j
ob
l
o
s
er
s,
be
c
au
s
e
t
he
i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
redu
c
ed
t
he
t
o
t
a
l
amoun
t
o
f
l
abor
needed
t
o
produ
c
e
t
he
or
igi
na
l
amoun
t
o
f
t
he
g
ood
. I
n
order
t
o
re
-
emp
l
o
y
a
ll
j
ob
l
o
s
er
s,
t
he
e
c
onom
y
mu
s
t
g
ro
w
t
o
produ
c
e
more
o
f
t
he
g
ood
wi
t
h
a
ll
o
f
t
he
or
igi
na
l w
or
k
er
s,
or
produ
c
e
more
o
f
s
ome
o
t
her
g
ood
wi
t
h
t
he
c
heaper
l
abor
(
t
he
j
ob
l
o
s
er
s
)
no
w
a
v
a
il
ab
l
e
. I
n
e
i
t
her
c
a
s
e
t
he
e
c
onom
y
g
ro
ws. M
u
c
h
o
f
w
ha
t
w
e
c
on
si
der
pro
g
re
ss is
due
t
o
l
abor
-
redu
ci
n
g i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
s. I
n
order
t
o
li
v
e
wi
t
hou
t
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
, w
e
w
ou
l
d
ha
v
e
t
o
gi
v
e
up
t
h
is
k
i
nd
o
f
pro
g
re
ss,
or
i
n
t
rodu
c
e
arran
g
emen
t
s
t
o
a
ll
o
w w
or
k
er
s
w
ho
be
c
ome
unprodu
c
t
i
v
e
t
o
re
t
a
i
n
t
he
i
r
re
l
a
t
i
v
e
w
ea
l
t
h
and
s
e
l
f
re
s
pe
c
t
,
or
re
l
e
g
a
t
e
mo
s
t
peop
l
e
t
o
a
repre
ss
ed
under
cl
a
ss. T
here
is
a
po
w
er
f
u
l i
n
c
en
t
i
v
e
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
t
he
s
e
c
on
t
i
n
g
en
ci
e
s
b
y
en
c
oura
gi
n
g
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
.
B
)
T
he
s
e
c
ond
dependen
c
e
on
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
is i
n
t
he
c
rea
t
i
on
o
f
mone
y
b
y
t
he
a
c
t
o
f
borro
wi
n
g
a
t
i
n
t
ere
s
t
f
rom
c
ommer
ci
a
l
ban
k
s. M
u
c
h
o
f
t
he
mone
y
i
n
ea
c
h
l
oan
b
y
a
c
ommer
ci
a
l
ban
k
is c
rea
t
ed
b
y
t
he
l
oan
i
t
s
e
l
f
. T
he
ban
k
c
o
ll
e
c
t
s
a
f
ee
—
t
he
i
n
t
ere
s
t
—f
or
pro
v
i
d
i
n
g
t
he
s
er
v
ic
e
o
f
c
rea
t
i
n
g
t
he
mone
y
.
O
t
her
w
a
y
s
o
f
c
rea
t
i
n
g
mone
y
ha
v
e
been
e
x
p
l
ored
i
n
t
heor
y
and
pra
c
t
ic
e
.
S
u
cc
e
ss
f
u
l l
o
c
a
l
c
urren
ci
e
s
ha
v
e
been
ba
s
ed
on
s
ome
o
f
t
he
s
e
a
l
t
erna
t
i
v
e
s,
(
s
ee
D
ou
t
h
w
a
i
t
e
,
S
hor
t
Ci
r
c
u
i
t
,
pa
g
e
61
)
bu
t
a
ll
na
t
i
ona
l
mone
y
is
no
w c
rea
t
ed
b
y
i
n
t
ere
s
t
-
bear
i
n
g l
oan
s
f
rom
c
ommer
ci
a
l
ban
k
s. T
h
is w
a
y
o
f
c
rea
t
i
n
g
mone
y
c
on
t
r
i
bu
t
e
s i
n
s
t
ab
ili
t
y
t
o
an
e
c
onom
y
ba
s
ed
on
i
t
. I
n
order
t
o
k
eep
t
he
mone
y
s
upp
l
y
f
rom
c
on
t
ra
c
t
i
n
g w
hen
a
l
oan
and
i
t
s i
n
t
ere
s
t
are
pa
i
d
,
a
l
ar
g
er
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
ne
w l
oan
s
mu
s
t
be
c
rea
t
ed
,
i
n
c
rea
si
n
g
t
he
mone
y
s
upp
l
y
.
(
T
h
is is
no
t
t
ran
s
paren
t
l
y
ob
v
i
ou
s.
F
or
a
more
de
t
a
il
ed
e
x
p
l
ana
t
i
on
, s
ee
D
ou
t
h
w
a
i
t
e
, T
he
Ec
o
l
o
g
y
o
f
M
one
y
,
pa
g
e
24.
)
W
hen
t
he
e
c
onom
y
g
ro
ws
t
o
ma
t
c
h
t
he
i
n
c
rea
si
n
g
mone
y
s
upp
l
y
,
t
he
v
a
l
ue
o
f
mone
y
is
8
re
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
s
t
ab
l
e
,
and
c
ommer
ci
a
l-
ban
k
-c
rea
t
ed
mone
y
is
ben
ig
n
. I
f
t
he
ra
t
e
o
f
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
doe
s
no
t
ma
t
c
h
t
he
ra
t
e
o
f
g
ro
w
t
h
o
f
t
he
mone
y
s
upp
l
y
,
t
he
mone
y
s
upp
l
y
be
c
ome
s
un
s
t
ab
l
e
.
G
i
v
en
t
he
u
s
e
o
f
mone
y
c
rea
t
ed
b
y
i
n
t
ere
s
t
bear
i
n
g l
oan
s
f
rom
c
ommer
ci
a
l
ban
k
s,
an
e
c
onom
y
c
an
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
he
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
g i
n
s
t
ab
ili
t
i
e
s
o
f
t
he
mone
y
s
upp
l
y
b
y
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
modera
t
e
g
ro
w
t
h
.
M
one
t
ar
y
i
n
s
t
ab
ili
t
y
w
ou
l
d
pu
t
sig
n
i
f
ic
an
t
ha
z
ard
s i
n
t
he
w
a
y
o
f
de
li
bera
t
e
a
tt
emp
t
s
t
o
c
on
t
ra
c
t
our
e
c
onom
y
un
l
e
ss
t
he
c
rea
t
i
on
o
f
mone
y
w
a
s
rad
ic
a
ll
y
re
f
ormed
.
C
)
T
he
t
h
i
rd
dependen
c
e
on
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
is i
n
t
he
po
li
t
ic
a
l
and
g
eopo
li
t
ic
a
l
need
f
or
t
o
l
eran
c
e
o
f
i
nequa
li
t
y
.
D
i
ff
eren
c
e
s
o
f
w
ea
l
t
h
are
a
t
l
ea
s
t
a
s
g
rea
t
wi
t
h
i
n
t
he
de
v
e
l
oped
c
oun
t
r
i
e
s
a
s
t
he
y
are
be
t
w
een
de
v
e
l
oped
and
de
v
e
l
op
i
n
g
c
oun
t
r
i
e
s. T
h
i
n
k
o
f
t
he
ra
t
i
o
o
f
t
he
a
v
era
g
e
i
n
c
ome
o
f
A
mer
ic
an
CE
O
s
t
o
t
he
a
v
era
g
e
s
a
l
ar
y
o
f
w
or
k
er
s i
n
t
he
i
r
c
ompan
i
e
s.
D
ome
s
t
ic
a
ll
y
and
i
n
t
erna
t
i
ona
ll
y
,
t
he
t
o
l
eran
c
e
o
f
t
he
poor
and
m
i
dd
l
e
cl
a
ss
e
s
f
or
t
he
e
x
is
t
en
c
e
o
f
w
ea
l
t
h
i
er
cl
a
ss
e
s
and
c
oun
t
r
i
e
s
depend
s
on
a
be
li
e
f
i
n
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
. T
he
poor
s
t
ru
ggl
e
, w
h
il
e
s
ee
i
n
g
t
ha
t
o
t
her
s
are
w
ea
l
t
h
y
and
s
t
ill
o
t
her
s
are
g
ro
t
e
s
que
l
y
w
ea
l
t
h
y
. T
he
poor
are
t
o
l
d
a
s
t
or
y
: i
f
t
he
y
k
eep
t
o
t
he
i
r
w
or
k
and
t
o
t
he
i
r
d
i
v
er
si
on
s,
and
t
o
l
era
t
e
t
he
r
ic
h
,
t
he
y
will
be
be
tt
er
o
ff
i
n
t
he
f
u
t
ure
t
han
t
he
y
are
t
oda
y
. T
he
y
be
li
e
v
e
t
h
is s
t
or
y
,
or
a
t
l
ea
s
t
don
’
t
re
v
o
l
t
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
i
t
,
be
c
au
s
e
i
t
is s
uppor
t
ed
b
y
propa
g
anda
and
s
hared
m
y
t
h
s,
and
ha
s
been
t
rue
f
or
man
y
. W
hen
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
d
is
appear
s
f
ore
v
er
,
t
he
poor
,
li
k
e
e
v
er
y
one
e
ls
e
, will
re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
ha
t
t
he
y
will
be
pro
g
re
ssi
v
e
l
y
w
or
s
e
o
ff
, wi
t
h
no
f
u
t
ure
re
li
e
f
po
ssi
b
l
e
. T
he
pea
c
e
f
u
l
t
o
l
eran
c
e
b
y
t
he
poor
and
t
he
m
i
dd
l
e
s
f
or
t
he
r
ic
h
will
d
is
appear
. A
pea
c
e
f
u
l
end
o
f
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
w
ou
l
d
requ
i
re
red
is
t
r
i
bu
t
i
on
o
f
w
ea
l
t
h
, wi
t
h
c
on
s
equen
t
po
li
t
ic
a
l
and
g
eopo
li
t
ic
a
l c
on
t
en
t
i
on
.
D
e
si
re
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
t
he
c
on
t
en
t
i
on
ma
k
e
s i
t
un
li
k
e
l
y
t
ha
t
de
li
bera
t
e
e
li
m
i
na
t
i
on
o
f
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
will
be
a
tt
emp
t
ed
be
f
ore
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
is
ended
b
y
na
t
ure
. T
he
i
n
t
o
l
eran
c
e
o
f
d
i
ff
eren
c
e
s
o
f
w
ea
l
t
h
t
ha
t
will
t
hen
appear
will i
t
s
e
l
f
no
t
be
t
o
l
era
t
ed
b
y
t
he
r
ic
h
,
c
au
si
n
g
add
i
t
i
ona
l
dome
s
t
ic
and
i
n
t
erna
t
i
ona
l c
on
f
lic
t
j
u
s
t
a
t
t
he
ad
v
en
t
o
f
o
t
her
ad
v
er
s
e
c
han
g
e
s. A
t
t
ha
t
t
i
me
, i
f
no
t
be
f
ore
,
t
y
rann
ic
a
l
repre
ssi
on
o
f
t
he
poor
will
g
rea
t
l
y
t
emp
t
t
he
r
ic
h
.
D)
T
he
f
our
t
h
dependen
c
e
on
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
is i
n
t
he
f
i
nan
ci
a
l
mar
k
e
t
s
—
t
he
me
c
han
is
m
o
f
c
ap
i
t
a
li
z
a
t
i
on
o
f
pub
lic c
orpora
t
i
on
s. P
ub
lic c
orpora
t
i
on
s,
t
he
ma
i
n
a
c
t
or
s i
n
i
ndu
s
t
r
i
a
l
e
c
onom
i
e
s,
depend
on
f
i
nan
ci
a
l
mar
k
e
t
s
no
t
on
l
y
f
or
c
ap
i
t
a
l
f
or
i
nno
v
a
t
i
on
,
bu
t
f
or
d
isci
p
li
ne
,
v
a
l
ua
t
i
on
,
mo
t
i
v
a
t
i
on
,
and
a
ma
j
or
par
t
o
f
t
he
i
r
ra
t
i
ona
l
e
f
or
e
x
is
t
en
c
e
.
O
w
ner
s
o
f
c
ap
i
t
a
l
—
i
n
v
e
s
t
or
s
—
gi
v
e
t
he
u
s
e
o
f
i
t
o
v
er
t
o
pub
lic c
orpora
t
i
on
s
b
y
bu
y
i
n
g
equ
i
t
y
or
deb
t
i
n
f
i
nan
ci
a
l
mar
k
e
t
s. T
he
y
do
s
o
on
l
y
be
c
au
s
e
t
he
y
e
x
pe
c
t
t
ha
t
t
he
y
will,
on
a
v
era
g
e
,
and
o
v
er
t
he
l
on
g
t
erm
,
re
c
e
i
v
e
ba
c
k
more
t
han
t
he
y
g
a
v
e
up
. T
ha
t
e
x
pe
c
t
a
t
i
on
d
is
appear
s w
hen
mo
s
t
i
n
v
e
s
t
or
s
under
s
t
and
t
here
will
be
no
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
. M
o
s
t
o
f
t
he
apparen
t
9
w
ea
l
t
h
o
f
t
he
w
or
l
d
c
on
sis
t
s
o
f
equ
i
t
y
and
deb
t
bou
g
h
t
and
s
o
l
d
i
n
f
i
nan
ci
a
l
mar
k
e
t
s. A
n
y
rea
lis
t
ic
po
ssi
b
ili
t
y
o
f
t
he
end
o
f
g
ro
w
t
h
w
ou
l
d
f
ill i
n
v
e
s
t
or
s wi
t
h
s
ome
t
h
i
n
g li
k
e
t
error
. P
o
li
t
ic
a
l i
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
br
i
n
g
an
end
t
o
g
ro
w
t
h
will
be
oppo
s
ed
b
y
i
n
v
e
s
t
or
s wi
t
h
e
v
er
y
mean
s
a
t
t
he
i
r
c
ommand
. T
he
c
on
t
ro
v
er
si
a
l
na
t
ure
o
f
propo
s
a
ls
t
ha
t
w
ou
l
d
redu
c
e
or
e
li
m
i
na
t
e
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
will li
k
e
l
y
pre
v
en
t
t
he
propo
s
a
ls
f
rom
rea
c
h
i
n
g
e
v
en
t
he
s
t
a
t
u
s
o
f
po
li
t
ic
a
l c
on
t
en
t
i
on
. W
hen
t
he
on
s
e
t
o
f
s
u
s
t
a
i
ned
e
c
onom
ic c
on
t
ra
c
t
i
on
is g
enera
ll
y
per
c
e
i
v
ed
, i
n
v
e
s
t
or
s will
wi
t
hdra
w
f
rom
f
i
nan
ci
a
l
mar
k
e
t
s. T
he
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
a
il
ure
o
f
t
he
mar
k
e
t
s will
ma
k
e
man
y
ne
c
e
ss
ar
y
de
v
e
l
opmen
t
s i
mpo
ssi
b
l
e
t
o
f
i
nan
c
e
and
will
produ
c
e
c
on
f
u
si
on
and
s
t
a
sis i
n
pub
lic c
orpora
t
i
on
s
j
u
s
t
w
hen
w
e
need
t
hem
t
o
adap
t
t
o
ne
w
ci
r
c
um
s
t
an
c
e
s.
[
end
o
f
Ec
onom
ic
G
ro
w
t
h
T
rap
]
W
e
ma
y
a
ss
ume
t
ha
t
,
a
f
t
er
a
ll
rea
s
onab
l
y
an
t
ici
pa
t
ed
ener
g
y
c
on
s
er
v
a
t
i
on
t
e
c
hno
l
o
g
y
ha
s
been
de
v
e
l
oped
and
i
n
s
t
a
ll
ed
,
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
mu
s
t
be
a
cc
ompan
i
ed
b
y
g
ro
w
t
h
i
n
ener
g
y
c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
, w
h
ic
h
mu
s
t
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
t
he
rap
i
d
on
s
e
t
o
f
P
ea
k
O
il i
n
t
he
s
en
s
e
o
f
H
ubber
t
and
, s
ub
s
equen
t
l
y
- i
f
perm
i
tt
ed
-
e
x
ponen
t
i
a
l g
ro
w
t
h
i
n
t
he
number
o
f
nu
cl
ear
i
n
s
t
a
ll
a
t
i
on
s. W
e
mu
s
t
a
ss
ume
t
ha
t
,
wi
t
hou
t
f
u
si
on
, s
ome
s
or
t
o
f
breeder
rea
c
t
or
will
rep
l
a
c
e
f
issi
on
. E
v
en
i
f
w
e
ne
gl
e
c
t
gl
oba
l w
arm
i
n
g
and
t
he
C
h
i
na
S
y
ndrome
, w
e
mu
s
t
gi
v
e
up
N
IM
B
Y, si
n
c
e
c
on
t
i
nued
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
will
p
l
a
c
e
a
nu
cl
ear
p
l
an
t
i
n
e
v
er
y
ba
c
ky
ard
.
I
t
ma
y
t
a
k
e
on
l
y
a
f
e
w
m
i
nu
t
e
s
t
o
read
t
he
h
y
per
li
n
k
ed
ma
t
er
i
a
l;
bu
t
, i
t
t
oo
k
w
ee
k
s
t
o
w
r
i
t
e
i
t
a
f
t
er
read
i
n
g
t
he
U
n
i
v
er
si
t
y
o
f
C
h
ic
a
g
o
’s
and
MIT’s
repor
t
s
on
t
he
f
u
t
ure
o
f
nu
cl
ear
.
S
ee
T
he
N
u
cl
ear
O
p
t
i
on
f
rom
I
n
o
t
her
w
ord
s, s
uppo
s
e
w
e
c
an
v
is
ua
li
z
e
a
w
or
l
d
i
n
w
h
ic
h
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
is
t
o
l
era
t
ed
i
n
t
o
t
he
i
nde
f
i
n
i
t
e
f
u
t
ure
. A
f
t
er
e
v
er
y
rea
s
onab
l
e
c
on
s
er
v
a
t
i
on
mea
s
ure
ha
s
been
t
a
k
en
b
y
a
non
-i
n
c
rea
si
n
g
popu
l
a
t
i
on
,
e
v
er
y
ne
w
quan
t
um
o
f
e
c
onom
ic
g
ro
w
t
h
will
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
a
c
orre
s
pond
i
n
g i
n
c
rea
s
e
i
n
our
t
o
t
a
l c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
o
f
emer
g
y
–
no
t
b
y
a
c
on
s
t
an
t
f
a
c
t
or
re
g
ard
l
e
ss
o
f
o
t
her
c
on
si
dera
t
i
on
s,
bu
t
b
y
s
ome
f
a
c
t
or
,
φ
,
g
rea
t
er
t
han
1.0.
(
Ac
t
ua
ll
y
,
φ
>
1
+
ϵ
, w
here
ϵ
is
a
c
on
s
t
an
t
g
rea
t
er
t
han
z
ero
; i.
e
.,
φ
is
no
t
c
on
s
t
an
t
,
bu
t
ϵ
is.
)
T
hu
s, c
on
t
i
nued
e
c
onom
ic g
ro
w
t
h
mu
s
t
be
me
t
wi
t
h
a
c
orre
s
pond
i
n
g g
rea
t
er
c
apa
ci
t
y
t
o
produ
c
e
ener
g
y
.
G
i
v
en
t
he
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
on
s
on
f
o
ssil
f
ue
l
produ
c
t
i
on
, w
e
mu
s
t
c
hoo
s
e
an
ener
g
y
produ
c
t
i
on
t
e
c
hno
l
o
g
y
c
apab
l
e
o
f
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
perpe
t
ua
l g
ro
w
t
h
. T
h
is is i
mpo
ssi
b
l
e
a
s
amp
l
y
demon
s
t
ra
t
ed
i
n
t
he
c
a
s
e
o
f
nu
cl
ear
ener
g
y
, w
h
ic
h
m
ig
h
t
be
t
he
be
s
t
c
ho
ic
e
f
or
t
he
a
tt
emp
t
.
S
ee
a
k
en
f
rom
w
here
t
he
f
i
n
i
t
e
si
z
e
o
f
t
he
E
ar
t
h
is
t
he
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
on
. Al
t
hou
g
h
w
e
k
no
w
o
f
no
e
x
c
ep
t
i
on
t
o
t
h
is
ru
l
e
, w
e
w
ou
l
d
s
t
ill li
k
e
t
o
ha
v
e
a
ma
t
hema
t
ic
a
l
proo
f
.
10
W
hen
I
embar
k
ed
upon
t
h
is
pro
j
e
c
t
, i
t
s
eemed
ob
v
i
ou
s
t
ha
t
w
e
w
ou
l
d
ha
v
e
t
o
abandon
f
o
ssil
f
ue
ls i
n
f
a
v
or
o
f
rene
w
ab
l
e
ener
g
y
,
pro
v
i
ded
rene
w
ab
l
e
ener
g
y
t
e
c
hno
l
o
gi
e
s wi
t
h
E
R
o
EI*
(
“E
R
o
v
er
EI s
t
ar
”
)
no
l
e
ss
t
han
1.0 c
ou
l
d
be
f
ound
or
de
v
e
l
oped
.
O
ne
had
t
he
sci
en
t
i
f
ic c
on
s
en
s
u
s
re
g
ard
i
n
g A
n
t
hropo
g
en
ic
G
l
oba
l
W
arm
i
n
g, w
h
ic
h
had
no
more
t
han
a
49
%
(f
or
t
he
s
a
k
e
o
f
ar
g
umen
t
)
c
han
c
e
o
f
be
i
n
g w
ron
g, i
f
w
e
ne
gl
e
c
t
pred
ic
t
i
on
s
a
s
t
o
j
u
s
t
w
hen
c
er
t
a
i
n
t
empera
t
ure
sig
npo
s
t
s w
ou
l
d
be
rea
c
hed
. W
e
ma
y
a
ss
ume
t
ha
t
s
u
c
h
sig
npo
s
t
s
t
ha
t
t
he
t
heor
y
pred
ic
t
s will
be
rea
c
hed
e
v
en
t
ua
ll
y
s
hou
l
d
be
t
rea
t
ed
a
s
t
hou
g
h
t
he
y
requ
i
red
i
mmed
i
a
t
e
a
c
t
i
on
,
j
u
s
t
a
s w
e
a
ss
ume
e
v
er
y
g
un
is l
oaded
. I
n
add
i
t
i
on
, w
e
had
t
he
f
i
n
i
t
e
s
upp
l
y
o
f
o
il,
t
he
c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
o
f
w
h
ic
h
w
a
s i
n
c
rea
si
n
g
e
x
ponen
t
i
a
ll
y
, w
h
ic
h
a
cc
ord
i
n
g
t
o
si
m
il
ar
rea
s
on
i
n
g, s
hou
l
d
be
v
i
e
w
ed
a
s
e
ss
en
t
i
a
ll
y
una
v
a
il
ab
l
e
.
O
ne
w
onder
s,
t
hen
, i
f
t
he
ma
x
i
mum
po
ssi
b
l
e
ener
g
y
produ
c
t
i
on
f
rom
rene
w
ab
l
e
ener
g
y
equa
ls
or
e
x
c
eed
s
t
he
t
o
t
a
l
ener
g
y
bud
g
e
t
f
or
t
he
en
t
i
re
na
t
i
on
. I
n
ci
den
t
a
ll
y
,
I
f
ound
i
t
ne
c
e
ss
ar
y
t
o
v
a
li
da
t
e
t
he
t
e
c
hn
i
que
w
hereb
y
t
he
ener
g
y
c
o
s
t
o
f
a
h
ig
hdo
ll
ar
pro
j
e
c
t
w
e
ll-
d
is
t
r
i
bu
t
ed
o
v
er
t
he
s
e
c
t
or
s
o
f
t
he
e
c
onom
y
w
a
s
f
ound
b
y
mu
l
t
i
p
l
y
i
n
g
t
he
E/
GD
P
ra
t
i
o
b
y
t
he
g
ro
ss c
a
s
h
i
n
v
e
s
t
men
t
f
or
t
he
pro
j
e
c
t
under
c
on
si
dera
t
i
on
. T
h
is
a
ss
ump
t
i
on
w
a
s c
orrobora
t
ed
b
y
t
he
ana
l
y
sis
o
f
“E
ner
g
y
i
n
a
M
ar
k
-II-Ec
onom
y
”.
F
i
na
ll
y
, “E
ner
g
y
i
n
a
N
a
t
ura
l Ec
onom
y
”
u
s
e
s
B
ureau
o
f
Ec
onom
ic A
na
l
y
sis
da
t
a
t
o
de
t
erm
i
ne
ho
w
mu
c
h
u
s
e
f
u
l w
or
k
will
need
t
o
be
per
f
ormed
per
un
i
t
o
f
t
i
me
a
f
t
er
w
e
po
w
er
do
w
n
t
o
t
he
E
ar
t
h
a
s
a
G
arden
.
F
i
na
ll
y
,
t
he
paper
nd
ic
a
t
e
s
t
ha
t
rene
w
ab
l
e
ener
g
y
t
e
c
hno
l
o
g
y
is i
nadequa
t
e
t
o
s
uppor
t
A
mer
ic
an
-s
t
y
l
e
C
ap
i
t
a
lis
m
.
H
o
w
e
v
er
,
e
x
amp
l
e
s
o
f
s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
l
e
po
li
t
ic
a
l
e
c
onom
i
e
s
are
gi
v
en
.
D
e
c
hr
e
mat
i
st
ic
a
li
sm
W
ha
t
is
t
o
be
done
wi
t
h
t
ha
t
s
e
c
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
po
ss
e
ss
or
s
o
f
s
pe
ci
f
ic
t
a
l
en
t
s w
ho
s
e
t
a
l
en
t
is
f
or
mone
y
ma
k
i
n
g
?
H
is
t
or
y
and
da
il
y
e
x
per
i
en
c
e
t
ea
c
h
u
s
t
ha
t
i
f
t
he
w
or
l
d
doe
s
no
t
de
v
is
e
s
ome
p
l
an
o
f
ru
li
n
g
t
hem
,
t
he
y
will
ru
l
e
t
he
w
or
l
d
.
N
o
w i
t
is
no
t
de
si
rab
l
e
t
ha
t
t
he
y
s
hou
l
d
ru
l
e
t
he
w
or
l
d
;
f
or
t
he
s
e
c
re
t
o
f
mone
y
ma
k
i
n
g is
t
o
c
are
f
or
no
t
h
i
n
g
e
ls
e
and
t
o
w
or
k
a
t
no
t
h
i
n
g
e
ls
e
;
and
a
s
t
he
w
or
l
d
’s w
e
l
f
are
depend
s
on
opera
t
i
on
s
b
y
w
h
ic
h
no
i
nd
i
v
i
dua
l c
an
ma
k
e
mone
y
, w
h
ils
t
i
t
s
ru
i
n
... is
enormou
sl
y
pro
f
i
t
ab
l
e
t
o
mone
y
ma
k
er
s,
t
he
s
uprema
c
y
o
f
t
he
mone
y
ma
k
er
is
t
he
de
s
t
ru
c
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
S
t
a
t
e
. A
s
o
ci
e
t
y
w
h
ic
h
depend
s
on
t
he
i
n
c
en
t
i
v
e
o
f
pr
i
v
a
t
e
pro
f
i
t
is
doomed
.–
G
eor
g
e
B
ernard
S
ha
w,
11
H
ere
is
a
c
a
s
e
i
n
w
h
ic
h
w
e
c
an
do
no
be
tt
er
t
han
t
o
quo
t
e
t
he
Wi
k
i
ped
i
a
, w
h
ic
h
is
perm
issi
b
l
e
under
t
he
app
lic
ab
l
e
ru
l
e
s:
t
ab
lis
hed
a
d
i
ff
eren
c
e
be
t
w
een
e
c
onom
ics
and
c
hrema
t
is
t
ics
t
ha
t
w
ou
l
d
be
f
ounda
t
i
ona
l i
n
med
i
e
v
a
l
t
hou
g
h
t
.
F
or
A
r
is
t
o
t
l
e
,
t
he
mone
y
i
t
s
e
l
f
is
an
unna
t
ura
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
t
ha
t
dehuman
i
z
e
s
t
ho
s
e
w
ho
pra
c
t
ic
e
i
t
.
one
y
f
or
g
ood
s,
and
ea
t
e
mone
y
f
rom
mone
y
,
bu
t
do
no
t
produ
c
e
u
s
e
f
u
l g
ood
s.
H
en
c
e
, A
r
is
t
o
t
l
e
, li
k
e
ondemn
s
t
he
s
e
a
c
t
i
on
s
f
rom
t
he
s
t
andpo
i
n
t
o
f
t
he
i
r
ph
il
o
s
oph
ic
a
l
e
t
h
ics. [s
n
i
p
]”
T
hu
s,
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
t
ha
t
are
per
f
ormed
t
o
ob
t
a
i
n
a
g
rea
t
er
s
hare
o
f
t
he
ne
t
pro
c
eed
s
o
f
t
he
e
c
onom
y
f
or
t
he
w
or
k
er
or
h
is
emp
l
o
y
er
bu
t
produ
c
e
no
t
h
i
n
g
t
ha
t
w
e
need
t
o
li
v
e
and
en
j
o
y
li
f
e
c
an
be
d
is
t
i
n
g
u
is
hed
f
rom
g
enu
i
ne
e
c
onom
ic
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
b
y
t
he
t
erm
“c
hrema
t
is
t
ics”. I
na
s
mu
c
h
a
s
t
h
is c
on
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
s
a
hu
g
e
o
v
erhead
on
t
he
e
c
onom
y
t
ha
t
w
e
c
an
no
l
on
g
er
a
ff
ord
a
s w
e
approa
c
h
P
ea
k
O
il, w
e
t
a
k
e
t
he
li
ber
t
y
o
f
re
f
err
i
n
g
t
o
t
he
e
li
m
i
na
t
i
on
o
f
c
hrema
t
is
t
ics
a
s
de
c
hrema
t
is
t
ic
a
lis
m
,
par
t
l
y
f
or
t
he
p
l
ea
s
ure
o
f
c
o
i
n
i
n
g
a
beau
t
i
f
u
l l
ar
g
e
w
ord
bu
t
mo
s
t
l
y
be
c
au
s
e
i
t
will
po
s
t
pone
t
he
e
x
t
i
n
c
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
human
ra
c
e
f
or
an
a
s
t
ronom
ic
a
l
per
i
od
o
f
t
i
me
. T
h
is
ana
l
y
sis w
a
s
v
er
i
f
i
ed
i
n
o
t
ic
e
t
ha
t
I
had
a
g
ood
no
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
s
p
li
t
be
t
w
een
e
c
onom
ics, i
n
t
he
s
en
s
e
o
f
A
r
is
t
o
t
l
e
,
and
c
hrema
t
is
t
ics,
e
v
en
t
hou
g
h
I
d
i
d
no
t
k
no
w
t
he
w
ord
.
N
o
t
ic
e
,
a
s w
e
ll,
t
ha
t
t
he
s
or
t
o
f
peop
l
e
w
ho
w
ou
l
d
o
w
n
t
he
w
or
l
d
,
a
s i
n
t
he
g
ame
o
f
monopo
l
y
, w
h
ic
h
li
k
e
wis
e
is
p
l
a
y
ed
i
n
a
w
or
l
d
t
ha
t
c
anno
t
g
ro
w, w
ou
l
d
be
s
t
r
i
pped
o
f
t
he
i
r
pe
c
u
li
ar
po
w
er
;
and
,
t
he
i
n
t
rodu
c
t
i
on
o
f
a
ne
w
mone
t
ar
y
s
y
s
t
em
(
a
c
ua
ll
y
a
s
y
s
t
em
o
f
ra
t
i
on
i
n
g c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
)
w
ou
l
d
pre
v
en
t
t
he
s
or
t
o
f
i
nequa
li
t
i
e
s
t
ha
t
pre
c
ede
v
i
o
l
en
t
re
v
o
l
u
t
i
on
s.
Can
R
e
sou
rc
e
D
om
i
nan
c
e
B
e
E
li
m
i
na
t
e
d
?
I
t
will,
o
f
c
our
s
e
,
be
s
a
i
d
t
ha
t
s
u
c
h
a
sc
heme
a
s is s
e
t
f
or
t
h
here
is
qu
i
t
e
i
mpra
c
t
ic
a
l g
oe
s
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
human
na
t
ure
. T
h
is is
per
f
e
c
t
l
y
t
rue
. I
t
is i
mpra
c
t
ic
a
l
and
i
t
g
oe
s
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
human
na
t
ure
. T
h
is is w
h
y
i
t
is w
or
t
h
c
arr
y
i
n
g
ou
t
,
and
t
ha
t
is w
h
y
one
propo
s
e
s i
t
.
F
or
w
ha
t
is
a
pra
c
t
ic
a
l sc
heme?
A
pra
c
t
ic
a
l sc
heme
is
e
i
t
her
a
sc
heme
t
ha
t
is
a
l
read
y
i
n
e
x
is
t
en
c
e
,
or
a
sc
heme
t
ha
t
c
ou
l
d
be
c
arr
i
ed
ou
t
under
e
x
is
t
i
n
g c
ond
i
t
i
on
s.
B
u
t
i
t
is
e
x
a
c
t
l
y
t
he
e
x
is
t
i
n
g c
ond
i
t
i
on
s
t
ha
t
one
ob
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
;
and
an
y
sc
heme
t
ha
t
c
ou
l
d
a
cc
ep
t
t
he
s
e
c
ond
i
t
i
on
s is w
ron
g
and
f
oo
lis
h
. T
he
c
ond
i
t
i
on
s will
be
done
a
w
a
y
wi
t
h
,
and
human
na
t
ure
will c
han
g
e
. T
he
on
l
y
t
h
i
n
g
t
ha
t
one
12
rea
ll
y
k
no
ws
abou
t
human
na
t
ure
is
t
ha
t
i
t
c
han
g
e
s.
C
han
g
e
is
t
he
one
qua
li
t
y
w
e
c
an
pred
ic
a
t
e
o
f
i
t
. T
he
s
y
s
t
em
s
t
ha
t
f
a
il
are
t
ho
s
e
t
ha
t
re
l
y
on
t
he
permanen
c
y
o
f
human
na
t
ure
,
and
no
t
on
i
t
s g
ro
w
t
h
and
de
v
e
l
opmen
t
.
—
O
sc
ar
Wil
de
,
T
he
S
ou
l
of
Man
U
nde
r
S
o
ci
a
lis
m
L
e
t
u
s s
e
t
a
si
de
,
f
or
a
momen
t
,
t
he
po
ssi
b
ili
t
y
o
f
a
bene
v
o
l
en
t
de
i
t
y
t
he
e
x
is
t
en
c
e
o
f
w
hom
w
ou
l
d
a
ss
ure
an
y
rea
s
onab
l
e
per
s
on
t
ha
t
re
s
our
c
e
dom
i
nan
c
e
ha
s
no
permanen
t
p
l
a
c
e
i
n
human
na
t
ure
(
t
he
is
m
)
;
or
, w
ha
t
amoun
t
s
t
o
t
he
s
ame
t
h
i
n
g,
t
ha
t
t
he
t
rue
na
t
ure
o
f
M
an
is i
nheren
t
l
y
nob
l
e
(
human
is
m
)
, s
o
t
ha
t
re
s
our
c
e
dom
i
nan
c
e
is
mere
l
y
an
e
x
amp
l
e
o
f
a
t
emporar
y
c
orrup
t
i
n
g i
n
f
l
uen
c
e
t
ha
t
will s
oon
be
c
orre
c
t
ed
. W
e
are
l
e
f
t
wi
t
h
li
tt
l
e
more
t
han
t
he
c
ho
ic
e
be
t
w
een
T
ran
sc
enden
t
a
l
I
dea
lis
m
repre
s
en
t
ed
b
y
t
he
C
openha
g
en
i
n
t
erpre
t
a
t
i
on
o
f
quan
t
um
me
c
han
ics
and
T
ran
sc
enden
t
a
l
R
ea
lis
m
repre
s
en
t
ed
b
y
t
he
gl
oba
l-
h
i
dden
-
v
ar
i
ab
l
e
s i
n
t
erpre
t
a
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
Ei
n
s
t
e
i
n
-P
odo
ls
ky
-
R
o
s
en
g
edan
k
ene
x
per
i
men
t
a
s
a
c
t
ua
li
z
ed
b
y
t
he
e
x
per
i
men
t
s
o
f
Al
a
i
n
As
pe
c
t
and
h
is c
o
-w
or
k
er
s. I
n
c
a
s
e
o
f
t
he
is
m
,
human
is
m
,
or
T
ran
sc
enden
t
a
l I
dea
lis
m
,
re
s
our
c
e
dom
i
nan
c
e
c
an
be
e
li
m
i
na
t
ed
f
rom
human
beha
v
i
or
b
y
e
li
m
i
na
t
i
n
g
t
he
c
orrup
t
i
n
g i
n
f
l
uen
c
e
,
name
l
y
,
ma
t
er
i
a
lis
m
,
or
b
y
t
he
t
i
me
l
y
i
n
t
er
v
en
t
i
on
o
f
g
ood
f
or
t
une
.
I
n
t
he
c
a
s
e
o
f
T
ran
sc
enden
t
a
l
R
ea
lis
m
, w
e
ma
y
re
t
a
i
n
hope
f
or
D
ema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
i
n
a
ll
bu
t
t
he
l
a
s
t
o
f
t
he
f
o
ll
o
wi
n
g c
a
s
e
s:
1.
R
e
s
our
c
e
dom
i
nan
c
e
is
no
t
an
i
n
t
r
i
n
sic c
hara
c
t
er
is
t
ic
o
f
human
na
t
ure
.
2.
R
e
s
our
c
e
dom
i
nan
c
e
is
an
i
n
t
r
i
n
sic c
hara
c
t
er
is
t
ic
o
f
human
na
t
ure
;
ho
w
e
v
er
, i
t
c
an
be
s
ub
v
er
t
ed
b
y
re
-
d
i
re
c
t
i
n
g i
t
t
o
w
ard
more
rea
lis
t
ic w
a
y
s
t
o
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
reprodu
c
t
i
v
e
ad
v
an
t
a
g
e
(
i
)
b
y
man
i
f
e
s
t
i
n
g
e
x
c
e
ll
en
c
e
i
n
a
ll
o
f
our
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s s
o
a
s
t
o
earn
t
he
adm
i
ra
t
i
on
o
f
member
s
o
f
bo
t
h
g
ender
s
or
(
ii
)
b
y
man
i
f
e
s
t
i
n
g
g
rea
t
er
s
e
x
appea
l
t
han
o
t
her
c
and
i
da
t
e
s
f
or
t
he
a
ff
e
c
t
i
on
s
o
f
member
s
o
f
t
he
oppo
si
t
e
s
e
x
. T
h
is
red
i
re
c
t
i
on
c
an
be
a
c
h
i
e
v
ed
b
y
edu
c
a
t
i
on
, i
ndo
c
t
r
i
na
t
i
on
,
l
e
gisl
a
t
i
on
,
or
an
y
c
omb
i
na
t
i
on
o
f
t
he
s
e
.
3.
O
ur
k
no
wl
ed
g
e
o
f
human
na
t
ure
is i
n
s
u
ff
ici
en
t
t
o
ma
k
e
a
j
ud
g
men
t
e
i
t
her
w
a
y
.
4.
F
i
na
ll
y
, i
t
is
po
ssi
b
l
e
t
ha
t
re
s
our
c
e
dom
i
nan
c
e
is
an
i
n
t
r
i
n
sic c
hara
c
t
er
is
t
ic
o
f
human
na
t
ure
t
ha
t
c
anno
t
be
s
ub
v
er
t
ed
–
e
v
en
b
y
l
a
w
ba
c
k
ed
b
y
c
er
t
a
i
n
and
s
e
v
ere
pun
is
hmen
t
, i
n
w
h
ic
h
c
a
s
e
D
ema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
is i
mpo
ssi
b
l
e
.
13
F
or
t
h
is i
mpor
t
an
t
s
ub
j
e
c
t
, w
h
ic
h
,
perhap
s, is
t
he
si
ne
-
qua
-
non
o
f
t
he
t
r
i
p
t
o
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
f
or
t
he
ma
j
or
i
t
y
o
f
peop
l
e
, I s
ha
ll
ha
v
e
t
o
re
l
y
pr
i
n
ci
pa
ll
y
on
t
he
w
or
k
o
f
o
t
her
s,
a
s I
ha
v
e
done
pra
c
t
ic
a
ll
y
no
t
h
i
n
g
m
y
s
e
l
f
e
x
c
ep
t
t
o
add
f
i
v
e
po
i
n
t
s
t
o
J
ohn
G
a
tt
o
’s
f
amou
s lis
t
and
t
o
s
a
y
w
ha
t
mu
s
t
be
s
a
i
d
i
n
t
he
ar
g
umen
t
f
or
t
he
l
e
g
a
li
z
a
t
i
on
o
f
dru
gs.
T
he
H
ig
her
E
du
c
a
t
i
on
B
ubb
l
e
W
h
y
K–12 E
du
c
a
t
i
on
D
oe
s M
ore
H
arm
t
han
G
ood
G
radua
t
e
edu
c
a
t
i
on
i
n
en
gi
neer
i
n
g
and
sci
en
c
e
M
y
P
er
s
ona
l Vi
e
w
po
i
n
t
C
hara
c
t
er
E
du
c
a
t
i
on
, A
n
t
i-
D
ru
g P
ropa
g
anda
,
and
R
e
ligi
on
C
hara
c
t
er
E
du
c
a
t
i
on
L
o
y
a
l
t
y
J
u
s
t
ic
e
C
omm
i
t
men
t
S
e
l
f
-
D
isci
p
li
ne
T
he
S
c
ape
g
oa
t
i
n
g
o
f
D
ru
gs
and
M
a
ss
Hy
s
t
er
i
a
R
e
ligi
on
J
ohn
G
a
tt
o
’s
S
e
v
en
-L
e
ss
on
S
c
hoo
l T
ea
c
her
T
he
R
o
l
e
o
f
M
a
t
er
i
a
lis
m
i
n
t
he
Mis-
edu
c
a
t
i
on
o
f
Y
ou
t
h
14
T
he
T
r
i
p
t
o
D
e
m
a
t
er
i
a
lism
P
l
ea
s
e
clic
k
on
t
his
t
o s
ee
lis
t
.
)
D
ema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
s
a
t
is
f
i
e
s
mora
l
requ
i
remen
t
s
and
is s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
l
e
.
T
hu
s,
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
s
a
t
is
f
i
e
s
mora
l i
mpera
t
i
v
e
s
t
ha
t
w
e
m
ig
h
t
adop
t
be
c
au
s
e
o
f
an
i
n
s
p
i
red
read
i
n
g
o
f
t
he
S
ermon
on
t
he
M
oun
t
,
a
cl
ear
appra
is
a
l
o
f
t
he
need
s
o
f
t
he
c
ommun
i
t
y
,
and
an
under
s
t
and
i
n
g
o
f
w
ha
t
c
on
v
en
i
en
c
e
amoun
t
s
t
o
f
or
an
en
t
i
re
c
ommun
i
t
y
. I,
f
or
m
y
par
t
,
t
e
s
t
e
v
er
y
pub
lic
po
lic
y
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
t
he
t
hree
c
r
i
t
er
i
a
d
isc
u
ss
ed
i
n
T
o
w
ard
A
x
i
oma
t
ic M
ora
li
t
y
i
n
O
n
t
he
P
re
s
er
v
a
t
i
on
o
f
S
pe
ci
e
s,
name
l
y
,
rea
s
onab
l
ene
ss,
u
t
ili
t
y
,
and
beau
t
y
.
N
e
v
er
t
he
l
e
ss,
e
v
er
y
po
li
t
ic
a
l
e
c
onom
y
upon
w
h
ic
h
w
e
hope
t
o
bu
il
d
a
l
a
s
t
i
n
g ci
v
ili
z
a
t
i
on
mu
s
t
a
f
or
t
i
or
i
be
s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
l
e
.
S
u
s
t
a
i
nab
ili
t
y
E
R
o
EI*, E
ner
g
y
R
e
t
urned
o
v
er
E
ner
g
y
I
n
v
e
s
t
ed
, is
t
he
M
ea
s
ure
o
f
S
u
s
t
a
i
nab
ili
t
y
.
15
O
n
t
he
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
on
of
S
pe
ci
e
s.
17
is is w
here
I s
a
y
t
he
mo
s
t
i
mpor
t
an
t
t
h
i
n
gs
abou
t
s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
ili
t
y
–
a
g
a
i
n
s
t
a
ll
odd
s
and
i
n
t
he
f
a
c
e
o
f
s
t
ron
g
oppo
si
t
i
on
.
S
ome
t
i
me
s
m
y
f
ru
s
t
ra
t
i
on
s
ho
ws.
h
is is w
here
I w
r
i
t
e
do
w
n
an
y
t
h
i
n
g
ne
w
t
ha
t
o
cc
ur
s
t
o
me
. T
ha
t
i
n
cl
ude
s
ne
w w
a
y
s
t
o
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
t
he
par
t
s
t
ha
t
f
e
w
peop
l
e
under
s
t
and
.
h
is
ha
s
a
f
e
w
do
c
umen
t
s
t
ha
t
are
f
ound
e
ls
e
w
here
. I
t
w
a
s
m
y
pro
t
e
s
t
re
g
ard
i
n
g
t
he
peop
l
e
w
ho
g
rabbed
s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
ili
t
y
.
b
l
o
gs
po
t
.c
om
and
don
’
t
under
s
t
and
s
u
s
t
a
i
nab
ili
t
y
.
18
is
rep
l
a
c
e
s
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
.wi
k
is
pa
c
e
s.c
om
, w
h
ic
h
w
a
s
a
pra
c
t
ic
e
s
ho
t
t
o
g
e
t
i
n
t
o
t
he
Wi
k
i
ped
i
a
. I
no
w
ha
v
e
a
be
tt
er
i
dea
o
f
w
ha
t
t
o
s
a
y
. A
f
t
er
a
ll,
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
is
a
li
m
i
t
i
n
g c
a
s
e
. I
t
is
on
t
he
boundar
y
o
f
t
he
s
pa
c
e
o
f
a
ll
po
ssi
b
l
e
po
li
t
ic
a
l
and
e
c
onom
ic s
y
s
t
em
s. I
t
s
hou
l
d
be
i
n
t
he
Wi
k
i
ped
i
a
and
t
he
s
e
are
s
ome
i
t
s
pr
i
n
ci
pa
l
c
hara
c
t
er
is
t
ics.
s s
uppo
s
ed
t
o
m
i
rror
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
.
ne
t
bu
t
I
f
i
nd
i
t
hard
t
o
k
eep
i
t
up
-
t
o
-
da
t
e
. I
ha
v
e
s
t
ar
t
ed
w
or
k
i
n
g
on
t
h
is
prob
l
em
.
W
e
N
eed
a
N
e
w M
one
t
ar
y
S
y
s
t
em
: T
he
c
omp
l
e
t
e
e
ss
a
y
a
s
f
ar
a
s I g
o
t
19
S
o
l
u
t
i
on
s
f
or
a
S
u
s
t
a
i
nab
l
e
and
D
e
si
rab
l
e
F
u
t
ure
ha
s
k
i
nd
l
y
po
s
t
ed
t
he
c
on
t
en
t
s
o
f
m
y
wi
k
i. I
t
is
a
v
er
y
g
ood
f
i
t
i
n
m
y
op
i
n
i
on
,
a
s
mo
s
t
o
f
t
he
c
on
t
r
i
bu
t
or
s
under
s
t
and
t
ha
t
w
e
ha
v
e
rea
c
hed
a
li
m
i
t
t
o
g
ro
w
t
h
t
ha
t
pra
c
t
ic
a
ll
y
g
uaran
t
ee
s
a
d
i
e
-
o
ff
s
ome
w
here
i
n
t
he
w
or
l
d
i
n
t
he
w
a
k
e
o
f
P
ea
k
O
il. A
mer
ic
an
s
are
sl
o
w
t
o
re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
Ov
er
s
hoo
t
be
c
au
s
e
our
g
o
v
ernmen
t
ha
s
made
i
t
i
t
s
bu
si
ne
ss
t
o
e
x
por
t
t
he
d
i
e
-
o
ff
t
o
f
ore
ig
n
s
hore
s.
M
an
y
o
f
u
s
ha
v
e
been
f
or
c
ed
t
o
redu
c
e
t
he
i
r
e
x
pend
i
t
ure
s
be
c
au
s
e
o
f
unemp
l
o
y
men
t
,
bu
t
v
er
y
f
e
w
are
m
issi
n
g
mea
ls. A
t
l
ea
s
t
, i
f
t
he
y
are
, I
am
no
t
a
w
are
o
f
i
t
.
O
n
t
he
o
t
her
hand
, s
t
ar
v
a
t
i
on
is
a
ll
t
oo
c
ommon
i
n
s
t
a
t
e
s w
here
w
e
ha
v
e
u
s
ed
our
m
ili
t
ar
y
s
t
ren
g
t
h
t
o
t
rade
ru
i
nou
s l
oan
s
f
or
pre
ci
ou
s
na
t
ura
l
re
s
our
c
e
s,
par
t
ic
u
l
ar
l
y
i
n
A
f
r
ic
a
, w
h
ic
h
s
eem
s
t
o
s
u
ff
er
no
ma
tt
er
w
ha
t
e
ls
e
is g
o
i
n
g
on
.
f
u
ll 600-
pa
g
e
boo
k
i
n
one
f
il
e
)
t
ab
l
e
o
f
c
on
t
en
t
s
h
y
per
li
n
k
ed
t
o
i
nd
i
v
i
dua
l c
hap
t
er
f
il
e
s
)
man
y
i
mpor
t
an
t
i
dea
s
f
rom
t
he
boo
k
– 56
pa
g
e
s
)
he
re
s
u
l
t
s
f
rom
“
O
n
t
he
C
on
s
er
v
a
t
i
on
-wi
t
h
i
n
C
ap
i
t
a
lis
m
S
c
enar
i
o
”
are
s
ummar
i
z
ed
i
n
“T
he
D
em
is
e
o
f
B
u
si
ne
ss
a
s
U
s
ua
l”, w
h
ic
h
is
on
l
y
t
en
pa
g
e
s l
on
g. T
he
e
x
ped
i
en
t
o
f
mu
l
t
i
p
l
y
i
n
g c
a
s
h
f
l
o
w
b
y
t
he
E/
GD
P
ra
t
i
o
is
20
j
u
s
t
i
f
i
ed
numer
ic
a
ll
y
i
n
“E
ner
g
y
i
n
a
M
ar
k
II Ec
onom
y
” w
here
t
he
w
e
ll
k
no
w
n
ra
t
i
o
o
f
ener
g
y
re
t
urned
o
v
er
ener
g
y
i
n
v
e
s
t
ed
(
E
R
O
EI
)
is
e
x
p
l
a
i
ned
and
e
x
panded
.
f
rom
C
hap
t
er
2
o
f
O
n
t
he
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
on
of
S
pe
ci
e
s
)
f
rom
“E
ner
g
y
i
n
a
M
ar
k
II Ec
onom
y
”
)
b
y
9w
)
21
ener
g
y
pa
y
o
ff
o
f
on
l
y
t
hree
mon
t
h
s
f
or
a
t
w
en
t
yy
ear
wi
nd
po
w
er
i
n
s
t
a
ll
a
t
i
on
.
(
T
he
U
R
L
f
or
t
h
is s
t
ud
y
ha
s
been
c
han
g
ed
.
Pl
ea
s
e
s
ear
c
h
ha
t
s
eemed
un
li
k
e
l
y
on
t
he
f
a
c
e
o
f
i
t
.
U
ndoub
t
ed
l
y
,
t
he
y
ne
gl
e
c
t
ed
t
he
h
ig
h
-
ener
g
y
li
f
e
s
t
y
l
e
s
o
f
t
he
c
on
t
ra
c
t
or
s w
ho
w
ou
l
d
re
c
e
i
v
e
t
he
c
a
s
h
pa
y
men
t
s. M
y
i
ne
x
a
c
t
me
t
hod
re
s
u
l
t
s i
n
a
m
i
n
i
mum
pa
y
o
ff
per
i
od
o
f
36
mon
t
h
s – 12
mon
t
h
s i
f
w
e
c
red
i
t
e
l
e
c
t
r
ici
t
y
wi
t
h
t
hree
t
i
me
s
a
s
mu
c
h
emer
g
y
a
s
f
o
ssil
f
ue
l. [
N
o
t
e
(
8-25-04
)
. I
be
li
e
v
e
t
he
reader
under
s
t
and
s
t
ha
t
t
he
un
i
t
s
o
f
GD
P
are
U
S
do
ll
ar
s/
y
ear
and
t
he
ra
t
e
o
f
ener
g
y
c
on
s
ump
t
i
on
is i
n
w
a
tt
-
y
ear
s/
y
ear
, s
o
t
he
y
ear
s c
an
c
e
l
ou
t
t
o
gi
v
e
w
a
tt
-
y
ear
s/
U
S
D
.]
he
ne
x
t
paper
w
a
s
m
y
f
i
r
s
t
cl
um
s
y
a
tt
emp
t
t
o
re
f
u
t
e
an
ar
g
umen
t
t
ha
t
is i
n
t
u
i
t
i
v
e
l
y
f
a
ls
e
. I
t
is
no
t
s
o
ea
s
y
t
o
re
f
u
t
e
l
o
gic
a
ll
y
w
ha
t
y
ou
be
li
e
v
e
t
o
be
t
rue
i
n
t
u
i
t
i
v
e
l
y
. P
eop
l
e
w
ho
d
isc
u
ss
t
he
me
t
hodo
l
o
g
y
o
f
sci
en
c
e
do
no
t
c
red
i
t
i
n
t
u
i
t
i
on
s
u
ff
ici
en
t
l
y
i
n
m
y
op
i
n
i
on
.
22
burn
@
dema
t
er
i
a
lis
m
.
ne
t
. C
orre
c
t
i
on
s, s
u
gg
e
s
t
i
on
s,
and
c
on
s
t
ru
c
t
i
v
e
c
r
i
t
icis
m
will
be
appre
ci
a
t
ed
. Vi
t
upera
t
i
on
is
a
cc
ep
t
ab
l
e
t
oo
.
B
orn
M
ar
c
h
24, 1934,
D
e
t
ro
i
t
, Mic
h
ig
an
. •
R
ed
f
ord
H
ig
h
S
c
hoo
l
D
e
t
ro
i
t
1951. •
BS
c
hem
ic
a
l
en
gi
neer
i
n
g Mic
h
ig
an
1956. • M
S
ma
t
hema
t
ics
N
Y
U
1968. • P
h
D
c
hem
ic
a
l
en
gi
neer
i
n
g
U
t
ah
1980. •
S
t
ud
i
ed
j
a
zz
drumm
ig wi
t
h
L
enn
i
e
T
r
is
t
ano
,
J
oe
M
ore
ll
o
, P
h
ill
y
J
oe
J
one
s, C
o
zy
C
o
l
e
,
S
t
an
l
e
y
S
pe
c
t
er
. •
H
ere
is
an
mp
3
v
er
si
on
o
f
t
he
re
c
ord
I
made
wi
t
h
L
enn
i
e
T
r
is
t
ano
and
P
e
t
er
I
nd
w
hen
I w
a
s 22
y
ear
s
o
l
d
. I
f
y
ou
are
i
n
t
ere
s
t
ed
, c
op
y
d
pa
s
t
e
i
n
t
o
bro
ws
er
.
w
eb
si
t
e
•
R
a
il
road
mode
li
n
g
and
mode
l
ra
il
road
pho
t
o
g
raph
y
:
27